![]() Ubuntu does a better job of figuring out what you have and installing itself correctly, and will automatically find and install updates for Ubuntu itself and applications you run. If I have a recent box capable of running XP or better acceptably, I'm more likely to look at something like Ubuntu. It's an appropriate choice for things like the old Fujitsu Lifebook I run it on. Puppy is intended and optimized for lower end hardware. But to be honest, if I were looking to displace Windows in a corporate environment with a Linux solution, Puppy would not be my choice. It sounds like it would run under a DOS emulator in Puppy. What you wrote is about what I was interested in. He tends to blurt things out in an excess of initial enthusiasm, then after he's had time to think about it, he decides it wasn't such a good idea. I doubt that he'll follow through though. I assume he meant to try replacing Windows with Puppy on one or more of the shop computers, and see if the shop software would run on those machines. I'm afraid I can't get more detailed or specific than that without risking my job.Īs for what I see Puppy doing, I'm not sure what the guy had in mind when he asked me if DOS programs would run in Puppy. All the data throughout the store is entered into this program, and all the various computers are tied together in a LAN. It runs on many different PCs, old and new, which run various versions of Windows, but nothing older than XP. It is as hardware independent as possible. It is a custom program which essentially computerizes the store, and makes it paperless. What sort of software is this? What does it do? Who will the user(s) be? Will more than one user need to run this at the same time? What else will use the data it generates?Īnd what do you see Puppy doing? If supporting a DOS program will be its only role, you're better to simply get a low end machine, install MS-DOS, and dedicate it to the task without the additional complexity of a host OS.ĭMcCunney wrote.What sort of software is this? What does it do? Who will the user(s) be? Will more than one user need to run this at the same time? What else will use the data it generates? Programs can't assume they are the only thing running on the machine in current systems. ![]() That was reasonable under MS-DOS, which was single-user and single tasking. The issue with supporting DOS apps is that many of them were written to directly address the hardware for performance. If your application will run in it, DOSEmu is probably the simpler solution, If not, DOSBox, Worst case, try installing MS-DOS in Virtual Box. ![]() He might be interested in switching to Puppy for at least some things, if it can run the shop software. Flash wrote:I demonstrated Puppy to the guy who takes care of the computers where I work, and he asked if it could run DOS programs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |